WHY?
Why ? Why is it that, when a person expresses an opinion regarding the destruction of a beautiful, existing, public marina to make way for a non nautical amusement park and private buildings that could have been located on undeveloped nearby land, they are labeled as “naysayers” and “progress haters” ? Who has ever said that we want the many miles of lakeshore to be left as it is?
Read more...
|
Bigger priorities than Phase Two
Under the Renew Thunder Bay Reserve Fund, we the taxpayers are being asked to pay more. Contribute to the renewal of our city. Creating a civic phoenix rising from the ashes of recession so to speak. It is hard to argue with the idea of making Thunder Bay a more beautiful, more livable community. A place we all can be proud to call home. The idea may have merit. That has yet to be seen. The priority of the projects the money will be spent on is the larger issue.
Read more...
City needs master plan
To the editor:
When Port Arthur and Fort William were in their formative years, plans were made for the layout of both towns.
These plans included typical city planning with such things as main streets, residential subdivisions, schools, hospitals, areas for commerce, rail layouts, etc.
Read more...
Pool 6 close up
The first step in an environmental assessment on the former Pool 6 site was taken Thursday with a public consultation session.
As the city begins its Terms of Reference, or environmental assessment plan, it must consult the public before submitting its intentions to the Ministry of Environment.
Read more...
Personal entitlement vs. collective good: Public losing ground
It has been nearly half a century since Jane Jacobs wrote The Death and Life of Great American Cities, and three years since she died. What she wrote and spoke about has never been more relevant than it is now, as cities all over the world grow in population. With that growth comes a broader recognition of the significance of bringing “people and activities together in a jumping, joyous urban jungle” (Douglas Martin, a New York-based journalist, wrote this in the New York Times after Jacobs’ death).
Read more...
Majority Not In Favour
I would like to reply to your editorial about the Friends of Marina Park (“With Friends like this,” Oct. 21) in which you imply the waterfront project is going ahead with the approval of the majority of citizens. Not so! Of the thousands of citizens we have talked to very few are in favour of condos at Prince Arthur‘s Landing. They are also against selling off this valuable piece of the property to a private developer. You support tearing up some of the existing infrastructure at taxpayers‘ expense and replacing it with condos and a hotel. We do not! Your editorials are just one opinion and do not represent the majority of the taxpayers.
Read more...
Friends of Marina Park Support Mayor's Walk
Question: Why not build condos in other parks such as Boulevard Lake Park?
Answer: Parks are for People. Boulevard Lake Park is for people and for events like the Mayor’s Walk for Volunteerism. Likewise, Marina Park, with its walking paths and trails, should remain available as it is today, the jewel of Thunder Bay’s park system, as a park for all citizen’s of Thunder Bay to use and enjoy. FOMP support trees, parks and trails; keep Marina Park green with mature trees and trails like Boulevard Lake Park. Friends of Marina Park raise funds in support of the 9th Annual RBC Royal Bank Mayor's Walk for Volunteerism held on
Read more...
Friends of Marina Park stage rally at city hall
About ten demonstrators representing Friends of Marina Park rallied outside City Hall Monday evening to show they are not going away and offered an update on their fundraising effort to finance an OMB hearing into residential development plans for the waterfront. The donations are still coming in according to group spokeswoman Katie Heikkinen. She could not say how much has been raised so far but they hope to have enough money by summer to move forward with their appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board to stop the waterfront redevelopment plan. Heikkinen said the youth of Thunder Bay are starting to get involved with their cause.
Why did the FOMP launch a request to the OMB?
Except for Councillors Rydholm and Hebert, individual Council members did not respond favourably to the efforts of individual members of Friends, nor to the collective efforts of Friends of Marina Park, to be heard with respect to their concerns about the waterfront development plan. On February 25th, Council did not respond to the petition presented by Councillor Rydholm; there was limited discussion with some councillors questioning the petition’s validity. At this meeting, Council defeated Councillor Rydholm’s motion to rescind the Waterfront Development Implementation Plan and Budget. Once Council passed the Waterfront Implementation Plan and Budget on January 28th, a specific time period for giving notice of appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) was triggered. The notice of appeal had to be formally submitted by March 3, 2008. Given that Friends had received, and were continuing to receive, strong support from the community with regards to its stance on waterfront development, and given that the group felt it had not made a significant impact on Council and its Waterfront Development Committee, and given that time was becoming a factor, Friends submitted the notice of appeal by the deadline, March 3, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|